May 09, 2008

The case for invading Myanmar

By Shawn W Crispin

A unilateral - and potentially United Nations-approved - US military intervention in the name of humanitarianism could easily turn the tide against the impoverished country's unpopular military leaders, and simultaneously rehabilitate the legacy of lame-duck US
. . .

While Myanmar ally China would likely oppose a US military intervention, Beijing has so far notably goaded the junta to work with rather than against international organizations like the UN, and more to the point, it lacks the power projection capabilities to militarily challenge the US in a foreign theater. Most notably, the US would have at its disposal a globally respected and once democratically elected leader in Aung San Suu Kyi to lead a transitional government to full democracy.

Many have speculated that Myanmar's notoriously paranoid junta abruptly moved the national capital 400 kilometers north from Yangon to its mountain-rung redoubt at Naypyidaw in November 2005 due to fears of a possible pre-emptive US invasion, similar to the action against Iraq. Now, Cyclone Nagris and the government's woeful response to the disaster have suddenly made that once paranoid delusion into a strong pre-emptive possibility, one that Bush's lame-duck presidency desperately needs.

Shawn W Crispin is Asia Times Online's Southeast Asia Editor. He may be reached at swcrispin@atimes.com

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/JE10Ae01.html

May 03, 2008

A Voice from the Burmese Grassroots

Come to this talk on Monday afternoon if you can!

A Voice From the Burmese Grassroots: a Talk by a Representative of
Burma's Only Grassroots Human Rights Organization

Date: Monday 5/5/2008
Time: 1:00 pm
Place: UC Berkeley's Goldman School of Public Policy
Room 250
2607 Hearst Ave. (Cross Street: LeRoy Ave)
Berkeley, CA 94709

This guest speaker is one of the co-founders of the Human Rights
Defenders and Promoters Network (Burma), and a Visiting Scholar at the
UC Berkeley Human Rights Center. He will be presenting about his
organization's work.

In 2002 the HRD started organizing human rights trainings in Burma,
acting since then as an unofficial grassroots network. It is
believed to be the only grassroots human rights organization in Burma
at this time. Our guest specializes in international relations for
the HRD.

You can read more about our guest (first name "Aung") in this Newsweek article from December 2007.

Why April is Black to Vietnamese Americans

An article on "Black April":

For many in Little Saigon, memories of what they went through still shape their reality. Others -- many born here -- look to Vietnam for opportunities and for ways to improve lives.

By My-Thuan Tran, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer (April 30, 2008)

Lives remembered, lives rebuilt, attitudes changing -- 33 years after South Vietnam fell

April 30, 2008

"Supercriticality" - Having a Smashing Good Time in Space

Geoffrey Forden, an MIT physicist and expert on the Chinese space program, was recently interviewed by John Johnson Jr. of the LA Times on the topic of the recent proliferation of space junk from China's missile test last year ("China Added to Space Debris" April 16, 2008). The news item caught my eye with the new-to-me and very impressive sounding word "supercriticality." Apparently that is what happens when space junk collides in a cascade of impacts. It is apparently very, very bad. Space is becoming cluttered to the extent that clutter will beget clutter, and in time it won't be possible to have something orbiting earth without it being damaged in a collision. This is what happens when space gets a "supercritical debris density" - which has already happened in some areas of space, according to NASA (see the "Cocktail Party Physics" link below for the specific reference).

Shooting down satellites isn't the sole purview of China-- the US also recently took a defunct spy satellite down to test its machinery.

    ... Forden called the Bush administration decision to shoot down its satellite "bad policy" because it could encourage other nations to build their own antisatellite weapons.

The difference is that the US target was in low enough orbit that the debris will burn up on reentry relatively soon. The debris from the Chinese missile test was in a much higher orbit, so the millions of pieces of debris that explosion created will remain up there clunking into the working satellites for hundreds of years to come.

    Forden said the threat of supercriticality was a warning that it was time to treat space not as a vast junkyard, but as a natural resource that must be protected the same way we were learning to protect resources on Earth.

Turns out we need better policy in space, too!


April 28, 2008

For Vietnamese, No Harmony in Olympic Torch Journey

by Antony Duc Le writing for VietWill (April 24, 2008).

By all accounts, the Ho Chi Minh City leg of the Olympic Torch relay taking place on the 29th of April is expected to be relatively trouble free for the Beijing government. Most likely, we will not see protesters in support of Tibet or Darfur in the streets due to Vietnam's strict laws governing public demonstrations. However, that does not mean that the Vietnamese people are welcoming the Olympic torch with open arms. On the contrary, for the past months, there have been intense discussions on internet forums and blogs of Vietnamese both inside and outside of Vietnam regarding the coming of the torch to HCMC.
Many Vietnamese, especially the educated young are actively campaigning for demonstrations on April 29th, which happens to coincide with the eve of the Fall of Saigon in 1975, to protest Beijing's aggressions in Vietnam's Eastern Sea (South China Sea). Vietnamese anger directed at Beijing is exploding once again fueled by recent renewed reports of the Chinese navy's capturing, shooting, and killing of Vietnamese fishermen. Previously anger surfaced in response to China's seizure of Paracel Islands in 1974, then again with the Spratly Islands seized since 1988. China asserts claims on all of the Paracel and Spratly Islands, and over 80% of Vietnam’s Eastern Sea, an egregious action that has no basis in international law. As a result, many Vietnamese fishermen who make their living in these waters have fallen victim to Chinese navy patrols.

Recently, Le Minh Phieu, a Vietnamese selectee to bear the torch in HCMC wrote to the IOC President to inform the Committee of Beijing's violations of Olympic rules by politicizing the sports festival. Phieu pointed out that Beijing took advantage of the Olympics to legitimize its illegal claims of Paracel Islands by depicting the archipelago on its relay route maps as Chinese territory. The tiny islands totaling only a few square kilometers in area appear enlarged and boxed off on the route map.

In December of last year, Vietnamese students staged protests in front of the Chinese embassy in Hanoi and the general consulate in HCMC for two consecutive weekends in response to Beijing's decision to establish the administrative region of Sansha to govern the Paracel and Spratly Islands. The protests in Vietnam spurred anti-Beijing protests staged by Vietnamese in many cities in Europe, Asia, and America.

Similar to its neighboring counterparts of New Delhi, Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, and Jakarta, Hanoi is also expected to be intolerant of protests on the occasion that the Olympic torch arrives to HCMC. Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung in a weekend meeting with officials in HCMC ordered them "to conduct the relay safely and solemnly, showing the patriotic, sports-loving and peace-loving spirit of the Vietnamese people and the Vietnam-China special friendship."

Hanoi has welcomed the Beijing's "men in blue" to help keep the relay incident free. But unlike the past protest attempts in which Vietnamese students were stopped by the police even before they made it to the designated site, this time, it is not possible, unless the city wants to stage an "audience-less" torch relay. So, everyone will have to be allowed to come to the site of the event.

But we can be sure that not everyone in the crowd will come to cheer for the torch. Some are expected to have a trick or two up their sleeves. If they do manage to pull off a protest or some sort of public gesture to show their anger at Beijing's aggression in Vietnam's Eastern Sea, the Vietnamese will most likely have all the media attention to themselves since it is unlikely that they have to compete with Tibet and Darfur groups. This was the obstacle that Vietnamese protesters faced in Paris and San Francisco, where virtually all the media attention was given to the Tibet issue, leaving the Vietnamese cause unnoticed.

The Olympic torch will come and go, but it is certain that the dispute over the Paracel and Spratly Islands will remain a quagmire for a long time to come. As China's economy grows along with its unceasing appetite for natural resources, Beijing will find it even harder to give up its claims on the islands and the waters of Vietnam's Eastern Sea, no matter how fragile those claims are from a legal standpoint. It has also been building a nuclear submarine base in Hainan Island to advance its ambitions. However, Beijing can also be sure that the Vietnamese people, especially the young generation, sense an urgency to defend Vietnam's territorial integrity and the lives of Vietnamese fishermen.

As Vietnamese are aware of Beijing's increasing aggression in the region, they are more likely to gather support and join hands in a concerted effort to thwart a possibility of Chinese hegemonic reality in Southeast Asia. When Beijing decided to establish Sansha last year, it probably did not expect that there would be such a strong reaction from the Vietnamese people. The issue at hand is whether Hanoi and the world is ready to take more assertive actions in the face of Beijing's outrageous violations against the Vietnamese people and their national territories.

April 20, 2008

The Nanotechnology Forum this Sunday April 27th

UC Berkeley and the surrounding National Labs are some of the premier nanotechnology research institutions in the world. In addition, Berkeley is the first government entity to have regulated nanotechnology. The scope for debate between the promotion and regulation of this exciting new scientific development is huge. The day-long event organized for this Sunday will discuss the potential of nanotechnology for solar panels and the potential toxicity of nanoparticles. It is true that large-scale nanotechnology is still a few years away- but as future policy-makers shouldn't we try to keep ahead of the trends? If not now, are we more likely to do so once established as office bureaucrats?!

This year's nano-toxicity panel brings representatives from Cal-EPA and LBNL to discuss how concerned should we really be, and what the government of our State is beginning to do about it.

For more information, or to register, please visit the website: http://nanoclub.berkeley.edu.

April 16, 2008

Fed Rate Cuts Causing Riots in Africa? Like It Or Not, It’s a Small World After All

In a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed column, Martin Feldstein – a well known economist of Reagan Administration fame – decries the Federal Reserve’s continued tax cuts as a solution to the imminent economic recession in the U.S. Feldstein argues that rate cuts will be ineffective at preventing a recession due to our fouled credit market and glut of unsold houses, while the cuts may worsen the food crisis in developing countries abroad.

How could U.S. interest rates at home possibly worsen food crises in countries like Egypt, South Africa, and Haiti? According to Feldstein, the interaction of lower Federal Reserve rates, inflation of food and energy prices, and central bank reactions in developing countries would all effectively reduce incomes in those countries. At the same time, riots have broken out in these same developing countries in response to high food and energy prices – global food prices alone have risen 83% in the last three years, according to the World Bank.

Feldstein’s column is an interesting study of the macroeconomics of Federal Reserve rate cuts, but it also highlights an important reality whether or not you agree with the details of his analysis: Our economy and economic policies are deeply intertwined with the rest of the world. China’s increased energy needs raise our oil prices. Our attempts to stem recession or replace gasoline with corn ethanol raise food prices in Egypt. Riots in Egypt raise uncertainty around oil supplies in the Middle East and raise our oil prices. The cycle repeats.

In this eternal season of U.S. presidential campaign rhetoric, Feldstein’s column points out the dangers of getting votes by promising simplistic and short-sighted domestic band-aids for problems like losing jobs oversees or high gas prices. Voters and candidates alike should keep in mind that many of our problems are harder – and more global – than they used to be. The world, it seems, is even smaller than we thought.

For Feldstein’s whole scoop and to test your macroeconomics literacy, see his column at the Wall Street Journal Online.

How Many Congressmen Does It Take to Change a Lightbulb?

Eco-friendly system will put U.S. Capitol in new light - by Christopher Lee, The Washington Post (April 4, 2008)

Pelosi plans to upgrade the lighting system at the Capitol Dome. Battling global climate change, one lightbulb at a time...

    "Everyone supports making the Capitol more energy-efficient, but we don't have to waste taxpayer dollars to do it," said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio. "This is a ridiculous boondoggle."

April 14, 2008

And It Came To Pass

I chose to take last semester off from grad school because I went to Nepal for my summer internship and decided to stay and support/experience the Constitutional Assembly elections planned for November. Unfortunately, they were postponed, no one was sure if they would actually happen, and the time came for me to return home. Finally, a new date was set for April 10th, and as that date approached, it looked like the election might actually happen. I, along with the entire country and a large part of the international community held my breath that it would be a peaceful and fair election.

As I sit in Berkeley juggling my school responsibilities and collecting reports about Nepal from the news and via email exchanges with Nepali friends, I have become increasingly inspired and excited. Aside from a few violent incidents, the elections were relatively peaceful, and are being commended by international observers, even being called “remarkable and well executed,” by the Carter Center.

So much of my time in Nepal was characterized by an increasing appreciation for things I took for granted at home… the rule of law, good roads, infrastructure, voting... As I look at the pictures my friends have been sending me of election day I’m reminded of that, yet again.

Despite a slew of obstacles, including a very real threat of potential violence, people still lined up and waited for hours to vote. When they finally did get to vote, with the simplest of voting technology, they were given a ballot not full of names of candidates or parties, but of symbols to accommodate the large rates of illiteracy throughout the country and to make the process accessible to all.

In fact, a full 60% of the country turned out to vote – despite the rigid rules about voting in your home village, regardless of where you currently live. Even more inspiring is that incredibly, 51% of those who turned out were women! Not only does this validate all the work, done by so many people to try to empower women and help them understand the importance of their role in the process, but it serves as a testament to a profound shift in women’s participation in the public sphere.

The results are slowly coming in, with surprising results as the Maoists (the party who wages civil war for 10 years) seems to be wining by a significant majority. But so far, it seems those results are considered accurate, and are not being widely questioned. Let’s keep our fingers crossed that the grace which has encompassed this election so far is able to continue through the publication of the final results, and even further over the next few years as Nepal writes it’s new constitution.

I’m still holding my breath, but for the moment, I want to share my excitement and say: “Congratulations, Nepal!”

Photo of Nepalese ballot distribution, by Ajaya Shah, 10 April 2008
Photo_byAjaya_Shah_10apr08_Nepalese Elections.JPG

April 13, 2008

Goldman Environmental Prize Awardees Announced

Tonight the Goldman Environmental Prize winners for 2008 were announced (summaries cribbed from the Goldmanprize.org website):

North America: Jesús León Santos, Mexico: In Oaxaca, where unsustainable land-use practices have made it one of the world’s most highly-eroded areas, León initiated a land renewal program that employs ancient indigenous practices to transform depleted soil into arable land.

Africa: Feliciano dos Santos, Mozambique: Using traditional music, grassroots outreach and innovative technology to bring sanitation to the most remote corners of Mozambique, Santos empowered villagers to participate in sustainable development and rise up from poverty.

South & Central America: Pablo Fajardo Mendoza and Luis Yanza, Ecuador: In the Ecuadorian Amazon, Fajardo and Yanza led one of the largest environmental legal battles in history against oil giant Chevron, demanding justice for the massive petroleum pollution in the region.

Europe: Ignace Schops, Belgium: Belgium Raising more than $90 million by bringing together private industry, regional governments, and local stakeholders, Schops led the effort to establish Belgium’s first and only national park, protecting one of the largest open green spaces in the country.

Islands & Island Nations: Rosa Hilda Ramos, Puerto Rico: In the shadow of polluting factories in Cataño, Ramos led the movement to permanently protect the Las Cucharillas Marsh, one of the last open spaces in the area and one of the largest wetlands ecosystems in the region.

Asia: Marina Rikhvanova, Russia: As Russia expands its petroleum and nuclear interests, Rikhvanova campaigned to protect Siberia’s Lake Baikal, one of the world’s most important bodies of fresh water, from environmental devastation brought on by these polluting industries.

On a personal note: I am fiercely proud that my former colleague Marina Rikhvanova is being honored. She is a key member of the Siberian/ Russian Far East environmental network that my former workplace coordinates. She is the real deal, and she deserves this honor. And I'm happy to say that at tomorrow's ceremony I have been asked to help with her speech's subtitles! In her speech she - with characteristic self-effacement- will be refusing the award for herself and instead accepting it on behalf of "the environmentalists, scientists, students, journalists, senior citizens, and all those people who combined their efforts to protect [Lake] Baikal from the [Siberia-Pacific] pipeline construction."

For more information (in English) on the important work of Marina's organization, check out: Baikal Environmental Wave.

What you won't hear at tomorrow's ceremony that actually few people know, is that "The Wave" is a collective founded 18 years ago by three women, and (causing much confusion for me when I was facilitating grants to the group) they regularly rotate the Executive Director role between a set of senior managers (who all currently happen to be women). This rotation seems effective at keeping the most experienced organizers from executive burn-out. Their unusual structure plus the strength of talent in the group make it a remarkable organization.

April 07, 2008

Don't worry, CA, your smoke-free bars are still saving lives!

A new paper concluding that drunk driving increases after smokefree bar laws are passed was just published in the Journal of Public Economics (Adams and Cotti, J Public Econ 92:1288-1305;2008). Stan Glantz at UCSF, a pioneer in tobacco-free policy, set the record straight through his analysis of the research, disseminated through smokefree.net.. After detailing the article's questionable statistical practices and biased literature citations, Glantz concludes by emphasizing that even if we accept the authors' conclusions that a smokefree law is associated with 2.54 more accidents per year in the average county, the benefits in terms of just reduced heart attacks (about 20%) far exceed this cost.

April 06, 2008

UC Berkeley Professor & Author of "Torture Memo" in the News

Cal law professor John Yoo is in the news again lately. Yoo is the author of an infamous August 2002 legal opinion, written while at the US Justice Department, justifying the use of torture in interrogations. Last week the Pentagon declassified another argument by Yoo on behalf of the use of torture, an 81-page memo from March 2003: eyebrows are being raised, to say the least, by the memo's content. Here are a few relevant articles worth reading:

"White House asked DOJ how Bush could sidestep Fourth Amendment" - describing the circumstances of the memo, by Jason Leopold for the Online Journal, dated April 7, 2008.

"There Were Orders to Follow" - a New York Times Editorial from April 4, 2008.

"The Supremes Let John Yoo Off the Hook" - an opinion piece by lawyer Jay Youngdahl in the East Bay Express from the April 2-8, 2008 edition, referring to the recent decision of Medellin v. Texas and its implications for protecting John Yoo from war crimes charges.

John Yoo has been a member of the Boalt School faculty since 1993.

April 02, 2008

Politics of Climate Change

Though most people expect the Bush administration to do little to pass climate change legislation during its final year in office, there is still a tremendous amount of work being done in Congress. The Lieberman-Warner bill appears to be most likely to get 60+ support in the Senate this year according to Lieberman himself. But what would be the political impact of such a bill? Does it remove global warming legislation from the federal agenda? Or will it just create a not-as-good substitute for legislation that might pass in 2009 or 2010 with one of the current presidential candidates? If the Lieberman-Warner bill passes in 2008, then does that put more pressure on Republicans in this election cycle or remove political pressure from them? It would likely spur technology development and innovation but by how much?

One of the issues I have heard discussed is that any cap-and-trade or carbon tax system would have to require removal of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards and other pollution mitigation standards that would end up being a double-tax on carbon. Is this true? Businesses seem to be arguing so - that we need a balanced package for environmental regulation changes. Is the EPA capable of handling changes in Lieberman-Warner or should Congress be thinking about this.

On another note, the Wall Street Journal is today reporting that the EU cap-and-trade system has failed to lower carbon emissions. In fact carbon emissions have risen about 1.1% last year. Is this a policy failure or implementation failure?

April 01, 2008

UC Police Chief Speaks Out

On Tuesday, April 1 UC Berkeley Police Chief Victoria Harrison e-mailed the UC student body to explain how the University police force is dealing with the tree sitters. (Click here to read the full letter). April Fools joke? Hardly.

Harrison's 1,200-word expose was unexpected. She claims that an unsolicited student e-mail inspired her to share her thoughts on University policing policies. Her reply was thorough, eloquent, savvy, and downright impressive.

While I'm not wholly convinced that the University would be as responsive to a negative court order as the police chief contends, I respect her forthrightness. In a time when University police forces are being challenged for operating in secrecy, I commend Ms. Harrison for making this public statement.

What are your thoughts? (Police Chief Harrison will be reading this discussion thread, so take 5 seconds to share your ideas for improvement, your well-wishes, criticisms, or support for her policy).

March 09, 2008

Secretary Reich, Chocolate Bunny or Marshmallow Chick?

Our own Robert Reich was called on this week by satirist Stephen Colbert to explain how the Democratic front runners will devour themselves. After Prof. Reich soundly rebuffed Colbert's characterization of the Democrats as self-destructive, he faced a battery of culinary metaphors as Colbert attempted to extract Prof. Reich's candidate preference.

Lady fingers or black forest cake? Pizza that's half-Hawaiian but you're not sure what it will taste like, or plain pizza with cheese that's been under a heat lamp for thirty-five years? Chocolate bunny or marshmallow chick?

When he finally picked one, Colbert said, "I was afraid you were gonna say matzah."

The whole segment can be viewed on Comedy Central's site.

Just the part with Prof. Reich's metaphorical preferences can be viewed on Youtube.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2