{Media}

Building a (Small) Movement
Deb Kong || April 28, 2006 || Media

Someone once told me that you can craft the best, most innovative public policy, but unless you can get people to listen, it won’t make any difference.

He had a good point. (Thanks, Sasha.) This semester I had an interesting experience in making my voice heard, on a small scale. So I thought I would share the story of how 63 emails led to articles in the Washington Post, San Jose Mercury News, Associated Press, BBC News, stories on the local broadcast news, and played a role in this week's apology and product recall from adidas.

It started with an email from my cousin telling me about some sneakers adidas was about to release. I clicked on the link he’d emailed, and my screen was filled with a stereotypical caricature of an Asian person – slanted eyes, buckteeth, and bowl haircut. The image, by a San Francisco graffiti artist, was featured on a sneaker that was part of adidas’s Yellow Series. The sneaker had “Fong” written on its back heel.

My immediate reaction: Offensive. But I was busy studying for an econ midterm.

My cousin asked me what he could do to protest the image on the sneaker. A bit of background about him here: he’s a sneaker collector. I didn’t know people like this existed, but they do. They collect limited edition sneakers – shoes that are often designed by artists, issued in lots of a few thousand or less, and that cost about $200 or more.

I suggested he gather more information and compose an email outlining what upset him about the sneaker. Then I thought about how this reminded me of the Abercrombie & Fitch episode a few years ago. In 2002, the clothing chain started selling T-shirts with similar caricatures and sayings like "Wong Brothers Laundry Service – Two Wongs Can Make It White."

I was a reporter then, and I covered the protests by Asian Americans and others outside the company’s San Francisco store. I remember calling Abercrombie, which sent me a copy of its apology statement, and told me it was pulling the line from its stores. I reported this in a story that ran on the wire and was picked up by newspapers.

Because I’ve been a reporter, I’ve never taken a stand. I’ve always been the one watching events unfold. I decided that this wasn’t a bad time to change that. But how?

I called Keith Kamisugi, one of the most well-connected, media savvy people I know, for advice. I also called Jane Kim, an accomplished grassroots organizer who played a significant and effective role in the Abercrombie protests. They gave me some great advice that I think could be applied to other situations:

· Before launching any sort of protest, make sure the information is accurate. This builds credibility and, obviously, helps you avoid looking foolish.
· Talk to the parties who might be affected by your protest. In this case, that meant contacting adidas and calling the artist, Barry McGee, who helped create the sneaker. Get their perspective.
· Figure out what your goal is, and shape your actions accordingly. I had to think about this: Was my goal to get adidas to pull the sneakers? Start a boycott of the company? Apply public pressure? Make people aware of the issue? Educate them about the need to be vigilant of harmful stereotypes?
· Anticipate the unintended consequences. Keith pointed out that the upshot of protesting this sneaker would be to bring adidas more publicity, possibly helping it sell more sneakers.

Talking with him and Jane helped me clarify what I wanted to do. I decided I wanted to let people know about these offensive sneakers and to air the issue of how harmful stereotypes can be. I also wanted adidas – and other companies – to know they must be sensitive to the damage such stereotypes can cause, and I wanted to make them think more critically the next time they launched products.

One good way to do this, I figured, was through an email campaign. But not just an email campaign to my friends. Contact “influencers,” Jane said. So I put together a spreadsheet of names and email addresses at national and local organizations like the Asian American Justice Center, the Japanese Americans Citizens League, the Organization of Chinese Americans, and Chinese for Affirmative Action.

I also included media on the list, hoping they could spread the word to more people. I emailed a friend at the San Jose Mercury News, where I used to work; and reporters at AsianWeek; Hyphen Magazine; the Center for Asian American Media; journalist Jeff Yang; and the Asian American Journalists Association. I also emailed some bloggers who write about Asian American issues.

Emails from consumers were one way to bring pressure to bear on adidas. But it also needed to hear from people at a variety of levels. Keith suggested I identify Asian Americans on the company’s board and in its executive ranks, Asian American athletes it sponsored, and others it did business with.

Now that I had a list of names, I had to figure out what I wanted to say. I thought about this carefully, because I knew the email could be forwarded to other people, and potentially quoted in other forums.

I started by telling people about the sneaker, and providing links to images of it on adidas’s Web site. “Why should you care?” I wrote. “This image perpetuates negative stereotypes of Asians, and adidas shouldn’t be allowed to make money off of such a concept. Adidas needs to know that this is not a fashion statement – it’s an insult.”

I also tried to anticipate some of the criticism the email could generate. On bulletin boards and blogs for sneaker collectors, a lively debate about whether the sneaker was a piece of art or an offensive stereotype was taking place. In a nod to this dispute, I wrote, “There has been some discussion on blogs about whether this constitutes racism, or whether it is simply an artist’s response to racism. But we think it is, at the very least, a bad marketing decision on the part of adidas. And, taken out of context, it represents an outdated stereotype.”

I ended by telling people we were also attempting to contact Asian Americans who were affiliated professionally with adidas. Then I asked them to make their voices heard, and included a link to the company’s online contact form and a 1-800 customer service number. I encouraged them to forward the email to friends, and provided a sample template for comments to adidas.

I asked Keith and Helen Kim to read the email before I sent it. Proofreading was a good idea. But it didn’t prevent me from making other email blunders.

Things Not to Do When Trying to Launch an Email Campaign

· Do not write the email in one email client, or in Microsoft Word, and then try to cut and paste it into another email client. If you do the former, you will end up with links don’t work. If you do the latter, you will wind up with strange symbols in place of apostrophes and other punctuation marks.
· Take the time to make it look pretty. I figured out too late how to make the links function as hyperlinks that readers could click on.
· Another thing about email appearance: pay attention to font. In pasting from Word, somehow my font ended up appearing very large, as if some very nearsighted person had written the email.
· To avoid these mistakes, send the email to yourself first. Seems painfully obvious, but I neglected to do it.

A final note: if you have read this far, thank you. I know many of you have more experience at organizing than I do, and would love to hear from you in the comments section of this blog.

NEXT: Working With the Media: My View from the Other Side

Continue reading "Building a (Small) Movement" »
Net Neutrality Policy Gets NYT Ed's Approval
Derek Turner || February 20, 2006 || Media

In today's New York Times, the editorial board comes out in favor of Network Neutrality legislation.

This comes on the heels of three Senate Commerce Committee hearings discussing Net Neutrality, Municipal Broadband, and video franchising. These intertwined issues are just a few of the topics under consideration as a part of the 1996 Telecom Act rewrite.

Continue reading "Net Neutrality Policy Gets NYT Ed's Approval" »
More Net Neutrality
Derek Turner || February 05, 2006 || Media

Sasha gave me the heads-up about this article in the Times about AOL & Yahoo’s plan to create a “tier” for email service. The plan would allow companies to pay a premium to get their mail to your inbox in a more reliable manner, bypassing these companies’ spam filters.

Today Kevin Drum of the Washington Monthly weighs in on the matter, highlighting that it may be another front in the network neutrality war.

But, I’m not too concerned about this – not nearly as concerned as I am about the telco’s plans to create a tiered Internet.

Why?

Continue reading "More Net Neutrality" »
Home Shopping Networks – A Beacon of Public Service?
Derek Turner || January 25, 2006 || Media

There are many natural resources endowed to us at birth… air, water, fossil fuels, and spectrum.

Spectrum?

What’s that you say? It’s the airwaves. It’s the natural resource that brings light to our eyes and radio to our cars. It’s the medium used to take x-rays, run your cell phone, and bring the Internet to your wireless laptop.

It’s a unique natural resource in the sense that it cannot be depleted. But certain technical limitations (i.e. interference) means it must be used with some level of oversight, so as to avoid the tragedy of the commons. Advances in technology may overcome this limitation, but we’re not quite there yet. Hence its regulation by the FCC.

All spectrum isn’t created equal. Some spectrum is good for one purpose, but not for another. You can cook a frozen burrito using microwaves or gamma rays, but I wouldn’t recommend the latter.

Similarly, certain spectral regions are better suited for transporting digital information. The spectrum used by over-the-air (broadcast) television stations is perhaps the most valuable, as the physical characteristics of this region of spectrum make it much more practical to transmit signals through buildings, hills, trees, and other objects that might block a higher frequency signal.

Some estimates put the value of the TV-band spectrum at nearly one trillion dollars. But how much does the FCC charge TV station owners for use of this resource?

Nothing. Nada. Zip, zilch, zero. And it doesn’t end there. The law also mandates that privately owned cable systems carry the signals of all local broadcast stations, vastly increasing their audience.

All the Congress mandates in return, is that the broadcasters act in the “public interest”. Ah, but the students of free speech out there will recognize the difficulty in actually ensuring this happens.

So let me ask you, should home shopping count as public interest programming? …

Continue reading "Home Shopping Networks – A Beacon of Public Service?" »
The Internet (1969-2006)
Derek Turner || January 20, 2006 || Media

Well, it was fun while it lasted.

But unless Congress and the FCC act to protect it, the Internet as we know it will cease to exist.

Regional monopoly incumbents such as Verizon and BellSouth are pushing to create a new kind of Internet – one where the content of big media companies get priority, while smaller content providers are segregated to their own Internet ghetto...

Continue reading "The Internet (1969-2006)" »
Creative Commons License

This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.