Variations of the word “confidence” appeared in the Bush’s State of the Union six times. At times, one could not help envisioning Bush prancing down an Austrian path singing “I Have Confidence” on his way to the von Trapp family home. And like Frauline Maria as she approached the gate, Bush demonstrated anything but confidence in his State of the Union address by admitting defeat, failing to make bold proposals, and…by backing away from the word “reprocessing.”
Attempts to operate intelligence gathering and sharing systems in obscurity put the entire homeland security mission at risk. Since 9/11, several scandals have suggested that public backlash can scotch programs. The solution is not to tighten the secrecy around these programs: almost nothing the government does is kept secret for long. Rather, federal and state officials must bring legislators, civil liberties groups, and the public into a wide-ranging political discourse on the appropriate level of domestic surveillance in a time of terrorism. Robust public debate, legislative oversight, and checks on agents will give our domestic intelligence efforts—which most observers consider necessary—a certain level of trust and resiliency to weather the snafus inevitable with new or newly-tasked bureaucracies.
Here's a (now-extinct) SAT analogy for you...
President Bush's open and public support of Fatah in the recent Palestinian elections is to Foreign Policy as _______________ is to Business.
The Iraqi election results were released yesterday, more than a month after the election itself, and with early objections from Sunni groups unaddressed (at least publicly). While the Shia bloc did not obtain an outright majority, and will therefore have to govern in a coalition government or poach Assemblymembers from other parties, the Prime Minister will almost surely be a religiously leaning Shiite. Sunni slates won 55 seats; Kurdish parties 58. Two semi-surprises: former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi's secular coalition won only 25 seats. Allawi, you will remember, was the most clearly American-backed candidate.
The second semi-surprise is that Ahmed Chalabi, whom some administration figures proposed as the "strongman" Iraq needed after the US invasion, and his list received exactly ZERO seats in the new Iraqi assembly.
The New York Times has one of their neat interactive graphics here.
Why confusing?